I have to say up front here, that I couldn’t give a good goddamn about the Catholic church – or ANY church for that matter – for reasons into which we will not delve today. However. This is unconstitutional and wrong, and oh did I mention UNCONSTITUTIONAL??
The [Democrat]-controlled Judiciary Committee has introduced Raised Bill 1098, a bill aimed specifically at the Catholic Church, which would remove the authority of the bishop and pastor over individual parishes and put a board of laymen in their place.
The complete bill is here
So many people utterly fail to comprehend the true meaning of “separation of church and state” (too busy worrying about the use of the word “God” in school functions) that I guess the fucking [D]s just thought they could slide this one in on them, no one the wiser, allegedly to help those who believe they have no recourse in a parish misuse of funds…except they already do under secular law, just like everyone else. So, those of you in the area, get out and do what needs doing to slap these uppity bitches back in their places. THEY work for YOU, goddammit, and they are Fucking Up by the numbers.
Sweartagad, this increasing tendency among these Empty Suit-worshipping fucktards to dismiss the Constitution of our beautiful country is Pissing Me Off. But that’s a natural reaction to knowitall pussies who think they know a better way than people who bled their guts out to gain independence for the Colonies.
I suppose that’s what scares them the most, this crazy notion of “independence” – after all, everything they do, every program at which they throw millions of tax dollars, is designed to quash independence, to prevent the proles from standing on their own two feet, having anything resembling self-respect, and therefore an opinon about how things should be run. To the grifters currently running things, that’s all dangerous and stuff.
Too fucking bad, I say. They NEED to be scared, they NEED to know we can “fire” them any time we please. THEY work for US, not the other fucking way around.
(Via Hot Air)
)
[...] the Corner via Liberty Girl: The [Democrat]-controlled Judiciary Committee has introduced Raised Bill 1098, a bill aimed [...]
Connecticut vs Catholic Church | pamibe
March 9th, 2009
Who was the congressweasel, a few months ago, who uttered the phrase, “I don’t CARE if it’s unconstitutional, it’s WHAT’S RIGHT!!”?
The open contempt for our nation’s highest law left me too flabbergasted to even remember the issue, though I think it was the Second Amendment, possibly in response to the Heller decision. Bill Clinton (may he get syphillis from his next tawdry affair) said something very similar during his AWB-1 days.
I’m working on getting my torch-and-pitchfork business up and running, here.
B Smith
March 9th, 2009
Along with torches and pitchforks we must include tar, feathers and rope. Lots and lots of rope.
Stretch
March 9th, 2009
I’ve read tht a lot of Catholics voted for Mr O.
But I think they’re going to have a bit of trouble explaining away Amendment 1. There’s a reason the Founders put it first.
I can only echo the words of Mr Welch, during the Army-McCarthy hearings:
Have you no shame?
ZZMike
March 9th, 2009
Don’t forget the rails. Also, shit like this is exactly why the founding fathers supported jury nullification.
toaster
March 9th, 2009
Yeah, but we’re running out of time on the Jury part. Too much more of this and we won’t have the “right” to criticize him.
folly
March 12th, 2009
Unfortunately jury nullification’s been in serious trouble ever since judges began leaving it out of their instructions to the jury when northern juries refused to hand down convictions on the fugitive slave act.
People need to know all of their rights- not just the ones the government deems it safe to tell them about.
toaster
March 12th, 2009
@Stretch: Tar & feathers, aisle three. Rope, aisle four.
@Toaster: Rails are out back.
Also, please be patient while we add our new product lines: bullwhips, stocks & pillories, Catherine wheels, guillotines, and our new special item, CHEESE GRATERS.
B Smith
March 13th, 2009