8 Responses to “Oh. Yeah.”

1. 

   Meh – all they backed off of was service and war related wounds. I think this means bye-bye for dependent coverage and the usual health care options…

   LauraB March 19th, 2009

2. 

   Point stands though. He’s got that leftist attachment to being seen a particular way.

   Vanity: A force so great it can only be used for Good or Evil.

   Mike Wilson March 19th, 2009

3. 

   Wish I could say “I agree”, LG. But I don’t. The only thing that will come close to re-acquiring control of some sorts will be the winning back of the House, the Senate or both in 2010 by the Repub’s. And, sadly, the Repub’s are doing very little to make-right their own dysfunctional house. And here we are w/a short 20 months away from the election. DD

   Darvin Dowdy March 20th, 2009

4. 

   @Darvin Dowdy: Agreeing with me is not a prerequisite.

   Liberty Girl March 20th, 2009

5. 

   Glad to hear it. Just had a harrowing experience over at Redstate. They booted my a__ off. I didn’t fit within their narrow view of conservatism. So, I’m a bit gun shy right now. Ha! thanks. DD

   Darvin Dowdy March 20th, 2009

6. 

   What there are no purges on this blog!?

   /sarc

   toaster March 20th, 2009

7. 

   Hey LG…I don’t have a problem with agreeing with you or not…but I do want to go drinking with your ol’ man.

   Bwahahahah!!!

   Sam March 20th, 2009

8. 

   I think he probably accomplished much of what he wanted to with this — those already serving in the military will not trust him, those who would consider entering the military will not trust him. Therefore, there will be more who retire, less who sign up, thus making this country less safe. Mission accomplished.

   This is an aside, LG, but what do you think of this H.R. 1388, which appears to be about involuntary/voluntary service ala Rahm Emmanuel?

   5kidsnadog March 20th, 2009